QRZ! Ham Radio 3/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 3.iso/digests/infoham/931467.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-06-04 | 27.4 KB

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 93 21:28:38 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1467
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Wed, 15 Dec 93       Volume 93 : Issue 1467

Today's Topics:
                    ARRL's callsign admin position
     Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 12 December
                     Help! 9600 baud info needed!
               how to scare away birds from my antenna
                  Info sought on QUANTUM batt. packs
                           Logging Programs
                    Precision resistors questions
              Receive broadcast FM on 2m mobile antenna?
                    Reciprocal operating in Canada
                    Review about dual-band radios.
                       Scratchi, January, 1960
                             Trying WEFAX
                            TVI weirdness

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 14 Dec 93 10:07:42 EST
From: sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!psinntp![e-mail]
Subject: ARRL's callsign admin position
To: [e-mail]

In rec.radio.amateur.misc, [e-mail] (Karl Beckman) writes:
>Jon - Let me amplify your point even further. I've never known any ARRL
>official who would not converse with a non-ARRL member amateur, or for
>that matter, most SWLs. Only a few of our politicians want to hear from
>persons who don't impact either their re-election or bank balances. As
>volunteers, you do try to represent ALL the US amateurs, not just your
>paying constituency, and that is certainly to the credit of each of the
>Directors and other ARRL officials.    73 WA8NVW

Just to clarify, I'm not a volunteer, I'm paid staff.  It's the
volunteer elected Directors who set ARRL policy, and your remarks
are right on, directed to them.
------
Jon Bloom, KE3Z                   | [e-mail]
American Radio Relay League       |
225 Main St., Newington CT 06111  |

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1993 22:29:03 MST
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!alberta!nebulus!ve6mgs![e-mail]
Subject: Daily Summary of Solar Geophysical Activity for 12 December
To: [e-mail]

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                 DAILY SUMMARY OF SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY

                                12 DECEMBER, 1993

                /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

                  (Based In-Part On SESC Observational Data)


SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL ACTIVITY INDICES FOR 12 DECEMBER, 1993
------------------------------------------------------------

!!BEGIN!! (1.0) S.T.D. Solar Geophysical Data Broadcast for DAY 346, 12/12/93
10.7 FLUX=090.9  90-AVG=097        SSN=033      BKI=1014 2200  BAI=005
BGND-XRAY=B1.4     FLU1=2.5E+05  FLU10=1.2E+04  PKI=2124 2211  PAI=007
  BOU-DEV=006,004,005,057,010,011,002,004   DEV-AVG=012 NT     SWF=00:000
 XRAY-MAX= B9.4   @ 0617UT    XRAY-MIN= B1.1   @ 0150UT   XRAY-AVG= B2.0
NEUTN-MAX= +003%  @ 1810UT   NEUTN-MIN= -002%  @ 1225UT  NEUTN-AVG= +0.3%
  PCA-MAX= +0.0DB @ 2350UT     PCA-MIN= -0.4DB @ 1315UT    PCA-AVG= -0.0DB
BOUTF-MAX=55353NT @ 1309UT   BOUTF-MIN=55341NT @ 1947UT  BOUTF-AVG=55347NT
GOES7-MAX=P:+000NT@ 0000UT   GOES7-MIN=N:+000NT@ 0000UT  G7-AVG=+063,+000,+000
GOES6-MAX=P:+113NT@ 1714UT   GOES6-MIN=N:-074NT@ 0946UT  G6-AVG=+087,+021,-035
 FLUXFCST=STD:090,090,090;SESC:090,090,090 BAI/PAI-FCST=010,010,010/010,010,015
    KFCST=1222 3221 1222 3221  27DAY-AP=009,008   27DAY-KP=3322 2123 3233 2212
 WARNINGS=
   ALERTS=
!!END-DATA!!

NOTE: The Effective Sunspot Number for 11 DEC 93 was  47.1.
      The Full Kp Indices for 11 DEC 93 are not available.


SYNOPSIS OF ACTIVITY
--------------------

            Solar activity was very low. All the regions on
       the disk are quiet and stable.

            Solar activity forecast:  solar activity is expected to be
       very low with a slight chance for an isolated C-flare.

            The geomagnetic field has been at mostly quiet levels
       for the past 24 hours. A period of active conditions
       occured from 0900-1200Z.

            Geophysical activity forecast:  the geomagnetic field is
       expected to be generally unsettled for the next three days.
       Influences from a coronal hole may increase levels to active
       sometime late on the third day.

            Event probabilities 13 dec-15 dec

                             Class M    01/01/01
                             Class X    01/01/01
                             Proton     01/01/01
                             PCAF       Green

            Geomagnetic activity probabilities 13 dec-15 dec

                        A.  Middle Latitudes
                        Active                15/15/15
                        Minor Storm           05/05/05
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/01/01

                        B.  High Latitudes
                        Active                15/15/15
                        Minor Storm           05/05/05
                        Major-Severe Storm    01/01/01

            HF propagation conditions were normal over the low and
       middle latitude regions.  High and polar latitude paths
       continued to see sporadic periods of below-normal propagation
       conditions, although there have been improvements in these
       areas over the last 24 hours.  Similar conditions are expected
       over the next 72 hours.


COPIES OF JOINT USAF/NOAA SESC SOLAR GEOPHYSICAL REPORTS
========================================================

REGIONS WITH SUNSPOTS. LOCATIONS VALID AT 12/2400Z DECEMBER
-----------------------------------------------------------
NMBR LOCATION  LO  AREA  Z   LL   NN MAG TYPE
7629  S20W66  083  0040 HSX  01  001 ALPHA
7630  S10W71  088  0020 HRX  01  001 ALPHA
7633  S17W78  095  0000 AXX  01  001 ALPHA
7631  N13W59  076                    PLAGE
7632  N05E31  346                    PLAGE
REGIONS DUE TO RETURN 13 DECEMBER TO 15 DECEMBER
NMBR LAT    LO
7620 N03   268


LISTING OF SOLAR ENERGETIC EVENTS FOR 12 DECEMBER, 1993
-------------------------------------------------------
BEGIN  MAX  END  RGN   LOC   XRAY  OP 245MHZ 10CM   SWEEP SWF
     NO EVENTS OBSERVED


POSSIBLE CORONAL MASS EJECTION EVENTS FOR 12 DECEMBER, 1993
-----------------------------------------------------------
               ISOLATED HOLES AND POLAR EXTENSIONS
      EAST   SOUTH  WEST   NORTH  CAR  TYPE  POL  AREA   OBSN
53   S43E34 S43E34 S09W16 S05W14  015  ISO   NEG   021 10830A


SUMMARY OF FLARE EVENTS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    2695 MHz  8800 MHz  15.4 GHz
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------  --------- --------- ---------
11 Dec: 2331  2336  2344  B2.5


REGION FLARE STATISTICS FOR THE PREVIOUS UTC DAY
------------------------------------------------

                C   M   X     S   1   2   3   4   Total   (%)
               --  --  --    --  --  --  --  --    ---  ------
Uncorrellated: 0   0   0     0   0   0   0   0    001  (100.0)

 Total Events: 001 optical and x-ray.


EVENTS WITH SWEEPS AND/OR OPTICAL PHENOMENA FOR THE LAST UTC DAY
----------------------------------------------------------------

 Date   Begin  Max   End  Xray  Op Region  Locn    Sweeps/Optical Observations
------  ----  ----  ----  ----  -- ------ ------   ---------------------------
                            NO EVENTS OBSERVED.

NOTES:
     All times are in Universal Time (UT).  Characters preceding begin, max,
     and end times are defined as:  B = Before,  U = Uncertain,  A = After.
     All times associated with x-ray flares (ex. flares which produce
     associated x-ray bursts) refer to the begin, max, and end times of the
     x-rays.  Flares which are not associated with x-ray signatures use the
     optical observations to determine the begin, max, and end times.

     Acronyms used to identify sweeps and optical phenomena include:

          II        = Type II Sweep Frequency Event
          III       = Type III Sweep
          IV        = Type IV Sweep
          V         = Type V Sweep
          Continuum = Continuum Radio Event
          Loop      = Loop Prominence System,
          Spray     = Limb Spray,
          Surge     = Bright Limb Surge,
          EPL       = Eruptive Prominence on the Limb.


**  End of Daily Report  **

------------------------------

Date: 14 Dec 1993 10:56:30 -0600
From: sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!bnrgate!corpgate!crchh327.bnr.ca![e-mail]
Subject: Help! 9600 baud info needed!
To: [e-mail]

I am trying to get a radio modified for 9600 operation, but so
far I haven't been able to get very much information.  I am
using a Kenwood TM-742A, and would like to run it at 9600.  If
anyone (preferably someone with a modified 742) knows how to
do this, please email or post here, or packet mail at
AB5PI@N5LDD.#DFW.TX.USA.NA

Thanks,
____________________________________________________________
| David E. Baker                    Opinions expressed are |
| Callsign: AB5PI                   mine, and they do not  |
| Internet: [e-mail]          necessarily reflect    |
| IP Addr:  47.122.65.7             the opinions of BNR or |
| Unix ID:  crchh7b0                or Northern Telecom.   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1993 00:21:25 GMT
From: newshub.nosc.mil!avalon.chinalake.navy.mil!peewee.chinalake.navy.mil![e-mail]
Subject: how to scare away birds from my antenna
To: [e-mail]

Scott Dorsey ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
: >I'm thinking of scaring away birds from my antenna
: >using ultrasound. I ever heard about people doing it,
: >but don't know what frequency to use, or which
: >output power.

I find using a bb gun to be the most gratifying.  Particularly if
the birds in question are loud and obnoxious and other flying objects
such as rocks, beer cans, and paint balls have failed to permanently
discourage them. ;-)

Many places sell phony owls and other predatory bird statues.  In
most cases these acomplish at least *some* deterrence.  I have heard a
garden hose strung around or near may be interpreted as a snake.
Fine nylon netting may be used that will not capture or injure
the birds, but they cannot fly through it and from a distance is
is practically invisible to humans.
Look for products in the garden dept. of a large hardware
or department store.

--
Erik van Bronkhorst KC6UUT DoD#4342585443 AMA#438054 BARF#002
Advocate and practitioner of Death Or Glory Programming (DOG-P)

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1993 11:48:09 GMT
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!malgudi.oar.net!witch!ame![e-mail]
Subject: Info sought on QUANTUM batt. packs
To: [e-mail]

Harry -
In article <2efqou$[e-mail]>, Matthew B Cravit ([e-mail]) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>
>>      I've been looking at battery packs for my TH78a.... Has anyone
>>      used the QUANTUM battery packs? Any feedback appreciated.
>>      73s de N1QVE    Harry   [e-mail]
>
>I've not seen the Quantum HT batteries, but I have had very positive
>experiences with the Quantum batteries for camera flashes. As I
>recall, they were high capacity gel cells with charging circuitry etc.
>built in to prevent overcharging. (A photographer friend of mine
>leaves hers plugged in all the time). Hope this helps.
>
>/Matthew (Still waiting for my ticket, 5 weeks and counting)
>
>--
>Matthew Cravit                      | All opinions expressed here are
>Michigan State University           | my own. I don't speak for Michigan
>East Lansing, MI 48825              | State, and they don't speak for me
>E-Mail: [e-mail]        | (thank goodness).
>
I use one for my TH-77A.  It is three years old and still going
strong.  It is heavy, but great for portable use and those days
when you will be helping with an event all day long.  It also is
nice to get the full 5 watts on high power (12v).
The comment about the charging circuitry is correct.  These are
lead acid batteries and they use an excellent charging circuit on
them.
Hope this helps.
73,
Pete WB0FEW

------------------------------

Date: 15 Dec 93 20:53:13 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Logging Programs
To: [e-mail]

     Greetings...

     I have seen the discussions relating to logging / QSLing software, and
     they have brought a question to my mind.  I'm looking for a logging
     package that has to meet some very specific (and apparently unusual)
     requirements.

     What I'm looking for is a system that will, upon my entering a call
     sign, interrogate my Yaesu CAT rig for the frequency and mode
     information, interrogate the QRZ! CD-ROM for name and address
     information, inquire of it's own database to recover information about
     previous contacts and notes that I made during those contacts and
     display all of this information on the screen.  At the end of the QSO,
     I press a function key, and all of this information, including the
     date and time, is written to the database as a log entry, for QSL
     cards to be printed later, after the operating session.  In this way,
     the computer takes over all the bookkeeping chores, and I get to enjoy
     the visit on the air.

     Is anyone familiar with any of the available logging programs that
     even comes close?  I'm far too lazy to want to log my HF contacts, so
     I'm obviously too lazy to try and write my own program (unless, of
     course, I have to in order to get what I want).

     Please respond through the group, in that I can't imagine I'm the only
     ham that wants one of these.

     73,

     Alan, N7CEU
     N7CEU@WF6O.#SOCAL.CA.USA.NOAM
     [e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 16 Dec 93 00:02:22 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Precision resistors questions
To: [e-mail]

Jeff, NH6IL asks about reading resistance values:


>I have questions concerning the following two precision resistors:

>1. Shallcross Akra-ohm wirewound type BX-100-J RB21B 13001F ABS

>   Is the resistance 13000 ohms? (1300 * 10^1 is how I interpret 13001)
>   What is the tolerance?

>2. Resistance Products Company LFB RB15AK 1R669F

>   Is the resistance 1.669 ohms?
>   What is the tolerance?

The value for the first resistor is 13,000 ohms 1%.  The last "1" in the string
indicates the number of trailing zeros.  The two zeros preceding the last "1"
are real numbers and could be any number from 0-9 and would be part of the
resistance value.

For the second, the value is correct at 1.669 ohms 1%.  The "R" represents the
decimal point and all digits following the "R" are real numbers.

The letter "F" indicates a 1% tolerance.

As for the remainging letters and numbers, I've forgotten what all of that
means, but believe they indicate case style, power rating and wirewound.

Hugh,   W6WTU

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1993 21:33:53 GMT
From: mvb.saic.com!unogate!news.service.uci.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!agate!apple.com!amd!netcomsv!netcom.com![e-mail]
Subject: Receive broadcast FM on 2m mobile antenna?
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Gary Coffman) writes:
>Note, a center of roof mount will still work better than the cowl
>mount, but [the combined AM/FM/comm antenna] is better than
>on-glass or magmount expedients.

I have wondered about that. I was about to buy an on-glass dual-band antenna
because a sunroof pretty much precludes center-of-roof mounting, and I saw
that the claimed antenna gain figures for such antennas were quite respectable.
However, assumed that the gain claimed included the loss associated with
the mount. Is this not the case? How much loss is associated with the
on-glass mount, assuming that the inside portion is properly grounded?

-- Bruce Toback

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 23:40:11 GMT
From: world![e-mail]
Subject: Reciprocal operating in Canada
To: [e-mail]

I will be visiting Toronto in a couple of weeks, and I was wondering
the following about my Technician (no-code) license:

1) Can I legally operate in Canada with it (if I get it by then)?
2) Are my authorized bands the same as they are in the USA?
3) How must I identify myself? Is my US callsign sufficient, or do I
   have to add any additional identification to it?
4) Is there anything else I should know about?

Thanks for any info anyone may be able to give me. Please respond via
e-mail to [e-mail] or [e-mail], in addition to
posting.

/Matthew (Callsign to go here, 5 weeks and counting.)

------------------------------

Date: 16 Dec 93 05:08:39 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Review about dual-band radios.
To: [e-mail]

I recently asked for comments about radios on this forum, and boy did I get
them!!  Here are the relavent parts about dual-banders:


I sincerely doubt you'll be able to find a dual bander for under $300.
The only one I know of which has been advertised in that price range
is the Alinco DJ-590. A friend of mine who has one has said that if
you put a better antenna on it, it becomes a quite respectable radio.
I would suggest trying to find someone who has one, and borrowing it
for a few days. Or else, find a store which will let you return it if
you don't like it.


The Icom (W2A) has quirks -- wierd batteries and charger connection
mean Icom is the only source and they'll be expensive, oddball
placement of the VHF volume/squelch knob next to the antenna
which makes it hard to turn -- but overall I like it.  The
receiver seems as good as any other HT, it's physically small but
not so small as to vanish or be hard to read, it doesn't look
ugly, and wide-band receive works pretty well.


(3) MOTOROLA radios are in a class by themselves.  They are indestructible.
    (I'm serious; I know people who have used them as weapons, *shattered
    the jaw of an assailant*, and still the radio was 100%.  The problem
    is that you pay 2-3 times what any other radio company would charge.
    Mot is just not great amateur gear.  Wonderful for public service.

Note--this doesn't have much to do with dual-banders, but it's a wonderful
story!

(4) I love my FT-530 with the digital speaker mic.  The IC-W2A is still
    gotta be one of the most sensitive radios on the market, great RX,
    wonderful, BUT -- no lit keypad, and a few other minuses.  Friends
    who have the alinco dual-bander like it, as it's cheap and good.


Several of my pals have Alinco 580 HTs and really like them. Myself, I went
with the Yaesu FT-530, afew bucks more, but I really wanted the dual in band
receive and the voltmeter. No regrets.


Count me as one who likes his Alinco - a DJ580. It's easy to use, is
easy on batteries, has a solid "feel" and has all the features I need (though
some could be implemented better). If someone has experience with the older
Alincos, they might have a different opinion.

Check around for used ones; I've seen them for as little as $275.


Check out the Radios Shack HT's. I know many folks who have them and they
like them a lot. Seems they have a very tight front end which means you
wont get intermod as bad as some of the others. Most dual band HT's are
pretty broad so you can expect lots (or at least some) interference.


This radio * is the only ham HT I have seen that approaches the
durability of a Motorola HT. It is light-years a head of the W2A. I
have a 24AT which uses the same batteries. Myself as well as every
other person I know who has an Icom with those batteries has had a
problem with the battery rails (plastic) cracking and falling off. :(

Note:  *=Yaesu FT-23R


Alinco radios are not bad. I have two of their mobiles, a 570 and a 590,
and I've found them excellent values. I don't own a DJ580, but several
of my friends do. I haven't heard of any problems. I use the Yaesu FT470
as my handheld radio. I like the user interface very much, and it has
a good thermal design, and an excellent battery saver circuit. However,
I'd encourage you to *not* make a handheld your first radio. I think
you'll find that a HT is less satisfactory than a mobile type rig for
most applications.


These comments were taken from the 20 or so responses I got to the question,
"Can anyone recommend a good HT to me?"  The authors are, in order:

Mathew B. Cravit
Jacob DeGlopper
Scott Swanson
Jason Penn
Bruce Toback
Barry Rose
Steven M. Knapp
Gary Coffman

The "reviews" for single-band radios and the few comments I got about TNC's
will come later.  Just email me at:  [e-mail]  with comments
or suggestions.  I need to say a big "thank you" to everyone who wrote, for
the help and the ability to brag about getting 17 email messages in 24 hours,
all from total strangers :).

I have just one thing to say:  please, please! no flames about this.  I think
we're all just about ashes now from the past few weeks, anyway.  If there's a
problem, email me.

Happy Holidays to everyone!

73,
Scott Gigot  N9VOM
[e-mail]
     We're working on the HT, now!

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 05:49:44 GMT
From: news.kpc.com!amd!netcomsv!bongo!skyld![e-mail]
Subject: Scratchi, January, 1960
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:

  > What was accepted then by the average person and what is acceptable now
  > has obviously changed, as have many other things in our society. "Amos
  > 'n' Andy" wouldn't get the same reaction today that it did in the
  > forties, either.

  (To those of you betting that I would get involved in this, collect your
  money.)

  Amos 'n Andy were played by white folks. They was funny back then, and
  they is still funny now. Rochester (Jack Benny's man-servant) was black,
  not a white guy playing a black man. The humor in both shows was based
  on situations. (Geeze, situation comedies, what a concept!) Jack Benny
  because he was cheap, and A 'n A because they were poor and a tad dim.

  If you wish to presume that I think all blacks are like those portrayed in
  Amos 'n Andy, simply because I find it humorous, you've lost your mind.
  And I refuse to appologize for finding it humorous.

  You should rent the tape "Raw" by Eddie Murphy and then come back and tell
  me about racist stereotypes.

  On prejudice, "I love women, but I wouldn't want my sister to marry one."
  73 es GE from Jeff


 Amateur: WA6FWI@WA6FWI.#SOCA.CA.USA.NA  |  "It is difficult to imagine our
Internet: [e-mail]          |  universe run by a single omni-
 US Mail: PO Box 4425 Carson, CA 90749   |  potent god. I see it more as a
   Phone: [phone]               |  badly run corporation."

------------------------------

Date: 14 Dec 1993 09:38:09 -0800
From: parc!barrnet.net!nntp.crl.com!crl.crl.com![e-mail]
Subject: Trying WEFAX
To: [e-mail]

Good Day all... I saw the request for information about trying WEFAX and
decided I had to put my 2 cents in...  I've tried a couple of the commercial
WEFAX packages and used the JVFAX that is available via ftp on several of the
machines.. I found that not only is the JVFAX cheaper to make (I did mine from
the junk box) and I know it can be done inexpensively from any parts store, but
when comparing the pictures obtained, you can't tell the difference from
the commercial  boards.. I'm sure the commercial stuff does other things
as well but for a trial, I recommend the JVFAX.
It works just as well and is well worth the cost... I lost interest but
it wasn't cause it wouldn't do the job.

73
Dennis
INTERNET: [e-mail]
    AX25: [e-mail]
   TCPIP: dennis@ccwest.n6ng



------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1993 22:34:42 GMT
From: library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!cupnews0.cup.hp.com![e-mail]
Subject: TVI weirdness
To: [e-mail]

sohl,william h ([e-mail]) wrote:
: In article <[e-mail]>,
: Thomas J. Farish <[e-mail]> wrote:
: >The Cable TVI saga continues.  I posted a few months ago about my
: >neighbor's complaints about interference with his TV (his house is
: >wired for cable TV in every room).

: RED FLAG...RED FLAG...

: plugged into it SHOULD then have a dummy 50ohm terminating plug

Surely you don't recommend terminating a 75 ohm system with 50 ohms?
Sure-fire 1.5:1 vswr! I would recommend 75 ohms.

Jim,WA6SDM
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 11 Dec 1993 10:04 PST
From: mvb.saic.com!unogate!news.service.uci.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.cyberstore.ca!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!erich.triumf.ca!bennett@network
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>.u
Subject : Re: 10-Codes (with 36/37 fixed)

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (arog on BIX) writes...
>
>In the post re: 10 Codes, 10-10 was given as "flight in progress."
>10-10 is more commonly "out of service, subject to call" here on
>the left.coast.
>
>------------------------------
>Alan Ogden, w6spk
>[e-mail] moderator of ham.radio
>

Around here, 10-10 means "negative"

10-61 and 10-62 are coffee break and lunch break respectively.
10-80 thru 10-89 are "record of <some offence>"


Peter Bennett VE7CEI                | Vessels shall be deemed to be in sight
Internet: [e-mail]   | of one another only when one can be
Bitnet:   bennett@triumfer          | observed visually from the other
TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., Canada     |                          ColRegs 3(k)

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1467
******************************
******************************